The Circumpunct Encyclopedia
A Unified Theory of Being, Relationship, and Truth
Version 2.0 — Formalized & Operationalized
How to Read This
1. The Symbol
⊙ = (•, Φ, ○)
• = Aperture (selector + integrator) — does operations
Φ = Field (state + coupling medium) — holds/transmits state
○ = Boundary (constraint + interface) — constrains interactions
Every being is this structure. The ancient symbol encodes complete ontology.
2. The Flow
Φ∞ → • → ⊙ → expression → Φ∞
Source → Gate → Being → Utterance → Return
Truth flows in, gets processed, being emerges, expression returns to field.
3. The Three Domains
Everything in this encyclopedia addresses one of three domains:
F, χ, T vs. L
κ, Lk, ⊙₁₂
H_i, W, TRT
Claim Tiers
This framework makes two kinds of claims. They must be evaluated differently:
These claims are testable and falsifiable. They make predictions about observable phenomena:
- Apertures are not self-sourcing (humans transform inputs, they don't generate truth ex nihilo)
- Functional and resonant channels produce statistically independent outcomes
- Parental awareness reduces intergenerational error transmission
- Projection introduces measurable non-Markovian signatures in output
Tier A claims can be supported or refuted by data.
These claims are ontological commitments. They provide interpretive framework:
- Φ∞ (infinite field) exists as ultimate source
- Relationship has independent ontological status (⊙₁₂ "exists")
- Parts are fractals of wholes
- Lies have no ultimate source (parasitic on truth)
Tier B claims are chosen, not proven. They're evaluated by coherence, fruitfulness, and fit.
Reading guidance: When you see equations and falsification criteria, they target Tier A claims. Tier B provides the interpretive lens but doesn't stand or fall on empirical tests.
Foundations
Chapter 1 — Ontological Primitives
1.1 The Three Fundamental Components
| Symbol | Name | Type Signature | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| • | Aperture / Soul | Operation: selector + integrator | Performs transforms on input |
| Φ | Field / Mind | Structure: state + medium | Holds and transmits information |
| ○ | Boundary / Body | Structure: constraint + interface | Filters and constrains interactions |
Enforcement rule: Throughout this document, • always does operations, Φ always holds/transmits state, ○ always constrains/filters.
1.2 The Circumpunct (⊙)
⊙ = (•, Φ, ○)
Every manifest being is a circumpunct—an aperture (operation) generating a field (state), contained by boundary (constraint).
1.3 The Infinite Field (Φ∞)
Φ∞ is the unbounded field—source of all signal, medium connecting all beings.
Apertures are not self-sourcing. In practice, humans transform inputs; they don't generate truth ex nihilo. All "original" content traces to prior inputs.
1.4 What Is Φ Made Of?
Φ is the space of constraints + signals that relate circumpuncts.
It is multi-realizable (like computation). Three realizations:
- Cognitive: attention, memory, perception, internal representations
- Social: language, norms, roles, shared meanings
- Physical: sensory channels, bodies, environments, media
This makes Φ a formal field (relational/informational medium), not a claim about new physics.
1.5 Core Axioms
Every ⊙ contains the structure of its containing system. [Tier B]
No aperture is a source. Every aperture transforms input. [Tier A: testable]
Distortion arises at •, not from an alternative source. [Tier A: testable]
⊙₁₂ has independent existence from ⊙₁ and ⊙₂. [Tier B]
All boundaries are gradients, not discontinuities. [Tier A: testable at measurement resolution]
Chapter 2 — The Aperture Function
2.1 The Core Operation
∞ →[•]→ 1
Input: unbounded potential
Operation: selection + integration
Output: singular actuality
2.2 The Aperture as Operator Triple
𝒜 = (G, R, U) G: H∞ → H• Gather/Gate (selects slice of input) R: H• → H• Rotate/Process (transforms selected input) U: H• → H₁ Utter/Emit (produces output) Total map: T_𝒜 = U ∘ R ∘ G
G = attention/selection mechanisms (measurable via eye-tracking, recall tests)
R = cognitive processing (measurable via reaction time, neural signatures)
U = expression (measurable via speech, behavior, physiological output)
2.3 The Fidelity Parameter
F(𝒜) = ⟨T_𝒜h(ψ), T_𝒜(ψ)⟩ / (|T_𝒜h(ψ)| · |T_𝒜(ψ)|) F ∈ [-1, 1] F = 1: Perfect fidelity F = 0: Orthogonal to truth F = -1: Perfect inversion
F = agreement between output and reference standard
Proxies: accuracy scores, consistency measures, inter-rater reliability, signal-to-noise ratios
2.4 The Binary Decision (χ)
χ = sign(F - τ)
χ = +1: truth-mode (F ≥ threshold)
χ = -1: lie-mode (F < threshold)
2.5 Self-Reference Property
𝒜 ∈ State(⊙)
The operator that generates the whole is represented inside the whole. This is "parts are fractals of wholes" in operator language.
Chapter 3 — The Field Equations
3.1 Local Field Dynamics
∇²Φᵢ - (1/c²)(∂²Φᵢ/∂t²) = -ρᵢ(•ᵢ)
This is a modeling choice, not a physics claim. Φ is a formal field (information/relational medium).
Measurable proxies:
- ρ (source density) = output rate, information generation frequency
- c (propagation speed) = communication latency, influence delay
- ∇²Φ (spatial variation) = gradient in connection strength across network
3.2 Field Properties
| Property | Symbol | Measurable Proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Density | ρ_Φ | Information concentration, attention density |
| Clarity | C_Φ | Linguistic coherence metrics, signal-to-noise |
| Turbulence | T_Φ | Variance, unpredictability measures |
| Conductivity | σ_Φ | Network coupling strength, influence coefficients |
3.3 Coupled Field Equations
∇²Φ₁ = -ρ₁ - κ₁₂Φ₂ ∇²Φ₂ = -ρ₂ - κ₂₁Φ₁
κᵢⱼ (coupling coefficient) = measurable via:
- Behavioral influence: P(behavior_i | behavior_j)
- Physiological synchrony: heart rate, skin conductance correlation
- Linguistic accommodation: vocabulary convergence over time
Chapter 4 — The Boundary Function
4.1 Type Signature
○ = constraint + interface (structure, not operation)
○: ∂(Φ_local) = surface where Φ_local → Φ_external
4.2 Boundary Properties
| Property | Symbol | Range | Measurable Proxy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permeability | P | [0,1] | Self-disclosure rate, influence susceptibility |
| Rigidity | R | [0,1] | Resistance to change under pressure |
| Definition | D | [0,1] | Self/other distinction in reports, behavior |
4.3 Boundary Pathology
| Condition | Configuration | Observable |
|---|---|---|
| Enmeshed | P → 1, D → 0 | Cannot distinguish own vs. other's feelings |
| Fortress | P → 0, R → 1 | Blocks all influence, isolated |
| Porous | P varies | Inconsistent responses to similar inputs |
| Undefined | D → 0 | Identity confusion, unstable self-concept |
Pathology
Chapter 5 — The Aperture Operator Algebra
5.1 The Four Pathologies
Pathologies are equivalence classes of transforms: 𝒜' = ℰ ∘ 𝒜
T'(ψ) = T(ψ) + α|self⟩
Type: Insertion error
Observable: Output contains self-reference independent of input
T'(ψ) ≈ β|void⟩
Type: Deletion error
Observable: Output independent of input variation
T' = -T
Type: Phase flip
Observable: Output negatively correlated with truth
T'(ψ) = T(ψ + γB̂T(ψ))
Type: Feedback contamination
Observable: Past output predicts current input attribution
5.2 The Syndrome Vector
Σ(𝒜) = (α, β, π, γ)
Diagnosis = estimating Σ from observed outputs.
α = self-reference frequency independent of context
β = input-output correlation (low β = high severance)
π = sign of correlation with reference (negative = inversion)
γ = autocorrelation of output > environment-output correlation
5.3 Pathology Composition
| Combination | Clinical Pattern |
|---|---|
| α + γ (Inflation + Projection) | Narcissism |
| β + incomplete R | Dissociation |
| π + γ (Inversion + Projection) | Paranoia |
Chapter 6 — The Syndrome Decoder
6.1 Observable → Syndrome Mapping
| Observable | Measurement | Indicates |
|---|---|---|
| Amplitude blow-up | ‖output‖ >> ‖reference‖ | α (inflation) |
| Amplitude collapse | ‖output‖ << ‖reference‖ | β (severance) |
| Sign reversal | ⟨output, reference⟩ < 0 | π (inversion) |
| Echo/recursion | output(t) ~ f(output(t-1)) | γ (projection) |
| Input independence | ∂output/∂input → 0 | β (severance) |
6.2 Syndrome Space
Healthy region: ‖Σ‖ < ε
Narcissism: {Σ : α > θ ∧ γ > θ}
Dissociation: {Σ : β > θ ∧ R_incomplete}
Paranoia: {Σ : π > θ ∧ γ > θ}
Topology
Chapter 7 — Temporal Topology
7.1 The String as Worldline
S(t) = ∏ᵢ A(tᵢ)|Φ∞⟩
Each moment of processing extrudes string. The self is a line being drawn, not a sequence of points.
7.2 String Features (Metaphor → Mechanism)
| Feature | Geometric Meaning | Psychological Correlate |
|---|---|---|
| Knot | Self-crossing | Recursive pattern, trauma loop |
| Twist | Torsion | Stored tension, unprocessed stress |
| Loop | Return to prior point | Repetition compulsion, cycles |
| Braid | Interweaving | Relationship history |
Chapter 8 — Fundamental Invariants
8.1 Linking Number (Lk)
Lk(S₁, S₂) = (1/2) ∑ crossings ε(c)
Meaning: Fundamental entanglement between two beings.
Key property: Lk is conserved (without cutting). You cannot unlove someone.
8.2 Writhe (Wr) and Twist (Tw)
Wr(S) = ∑ self-crossings ε(c) (self-knotting) Tw(S) = (1/2π) ∫ κ(s) ds (stored tension)
8.3 The Călugăreanu-White-Fuller Theorem
Lk = Wr + Tw
You can trade between self-knotting and tension, but their sum is conserved.
8.4 Total Relational Topology (TRT)
TRT(person) = {Wr, Tw, ∑Lk, ∑J}
Complete topological fingerprint of relational existence.
Resonance
Chapter 9 — Resonance Mechanics
9.1 Field Overlap
Φshared = Φ₁ ∩ Φ₂ + Φemergent
The shared region has properties neither field has alone.
9.2 Aperture Entrainment
dθ₁/dt = ω₁ + K₁₂sin(θ₂ - θ₁)
dθ₂/dt = ω₂ + K₂₁sin(θ₁ - θ₂)
Entrainment iff: K > |ω₁ - ω₂|
θ = phase of processing cycle (measurable via timing, rhythm)
ω = natural frequency (baseline processing rate)
K = coupling strength (synchrony coefficient)
9.3 The Two Channels
| Channel | Path | Content | Type Signature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | ○ → ○ | Resources, actions | Boundary↔Boundary (constraint exchange) |
| Resonant | • → • | Presence, recognition | Aperture↔Aperture (operation sync) |
⟨Cf | Cr⟩ = 0
The channels are statistically independent. One cannot substitute for the other.
High functional provision (Cf) does not predict resonant satisfaction (Cr) better than chance. Measurable via: satisfaction surveys factored into two scales, showing discriminant validity.
9.4 The Emergent Entity
⊙₁₂ = (•₁₂, Φ₁₂, ○₁₂)
The relationship as entity with its own aperture (shared processing), field (shared state), boundary (shared constraints).
Signal Theory
Chapter 10 — Truth and Lie Dynamics
10.1 Truth vs. Lie (Formal)
Truth: S_output = α · S_source|_projected + ε (ε small)
Lie: S_output = α · S_source|_projected + D + I
D = distortion of received signal
I = insertion from aperture (not traced to input)
10.2 Installation Equation
dA/dt = -λ(A - A₀) + μ · S_lie · Plasticity · Repetition
Lies install when installation pressure (μ term) exceeds restoration pressure (λ term).
10.3 Healing Equation
dS_lie/dt = -α · S_truth · Resonance · Receptivity + β · Reinforcement
Healing iff: α-term > β-term
Resonance = specificity of truth to lie (targeted vs. generic)
Receptivity = openness to correction (defense level)
Reinforcement = ongoing lie exposure from environment
Formation
Chapter 11 — The Inheritance Function
11.1 The Imprinting Function
I(τ) = I₀ · e^(-τ/τ_critical) · Window(τ)
Impact of input decays exponentially with age, with critical period windows.
11.2 The η Parameter
η ∝ Wr_parent · (1 - Awareness_parent)
Key insight: Awareness reduces transmission even without complete healing.
η (error transmission) decreases with parental reflective function / metacognition scores, controlling for stressor exposure and error severity.
Proxy measures: Reflective Functioning Scale, metacognitive awareness inventories, ACE scores (controlling).
11.3 Error-Specific Inheritance
| Parent Error | Child Inherits |
|---|---|
| Inflation | Extension role OR copies inflation |
| Severance | No template for source connection |
| Inversion | Baseline reality inverted |
| Projection | Becomes target, then projector |
Healing
Chapter 12 — The Witness Function
12.1 Witness Requirements
| Condition | Requirement | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Lower TRT | TRT(w) < TRT(p) | Gradient for flow |
| Sufficient Lk | Lk_min < Lk < Lk_max | Channel exists but not enmeshed |
| Fidelity | F(Aw) > θ | Reference signal is clean |
| Stability | Tw(w) < θ | Not reactive |
12.2 The Witness Equation
∫ [Wr · (F(Aw) - F(Ap)) · Openness · Lk] dt
Healing = ───────────────────────────────────────────────
Resistance + Interference
Chapter 13 — The Healing Operator Algebra
13.1 The Four Operators
| Operator | Targets | Mechanism | Observable Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| H_d (Deflate) | α | Non-mirroring | Present without admiring |
| H_r (Reconnect) | β | Persistent presence | Show up, be affected |
| H_p (Rephase) | π | Stable reference | Speak truth, don't argue |
| H_f (Differentiate) | γ | Boundary + naming | "That's yours, this is mine" |
13.2 The Canonical Sequence
H_f → H_r → H_p → H_d
1. Stop projection (H_f) — it contaminates all other signals
2. Restore source connection (H_r)
3. Correct phase (H_p)
4. Right-size self (H_d)
13.3 Non-Commutativity
[H_f, H_*] ≠ 0 for all *
Projection interferes with all other healing. Must address first (or concurrently).
Research Program
Chapter 14 — Core Hypotheses
Claim: Functional (Cf) and resonant (Cr) channels produce statistically independent outcomes.
Test: Factor analysis of relationship satisfaction items should yield two uncorrelated factors. High Cf should not predict Cr outcomes better than chance (and vice versa).
Measures: Develop and validate Cf/Cr scales; test discriminant validity; examine cross-prediction.
Claim: Projection (γ) introduces measurable temporal dependencies where past outputs predict current inputs.
Test: In time-series data, γ > 0 iff autocorrelation of output predicts attributed input better than environmental input predicts output.
Measures: Coded interaction sequences; Granger causality tests; compare output→attribution vs. environment→output pathways.
Claim: η (error transmission coefficient) decreases with parental reflective function, controlling for stressor exposure.
Test: Regression: Child_pathology ~ Parent_pathology × Parent_awareness + controls. Significant negative interaction term supports H3.
Measures: Reflective Functioning Scale; ACE scores; standardized symptom inventories across generations.
Claim: Healing requires truth that specifically targets the installed lie (high Resonance term).
Test: Generic affirmations produce less symptom reduction than targeted truth-speaking matched to syndrome profile.
Measures: Pre-post symptom measures; intervention condition (generic vs. targeted); syndrome-matched outcome tracking.
Claim: One secure attachment during critical period provides sufficient counter-template for recovery potential.
Test: Controlling for total attachment figures, presence of ≥1 secure attachment predicts better adult outcomes than count of insecure attachments.
Measures: Adult Attachment Interview; outcome measures (relationship quality, mental health).
Chapter 15 — Measurement Protocols
15.1 Syndrome Estimation Protocol
1. Collect output stream (speech, behavior, self-report) 2. Establish reference (healthy baseline or external standard) 3. Compute distortion metrics: - α: self-reference frequency independent of context - β: input-output correlation coefficient - π: sign of correlation with reference - γ: output autocorrelation vs. environment correlation 4. Estimate Σ̂ = (α̂, β̂, π̂, γ̂) 5. Locate in syndrome space 6. Prescribe H operators based on dominant components
15.2 Channel Discrimination Protocol
1. Administer relationship satisfaction inventory 2. Factor analyze into Cf and Cr subscales 3. Validate discriminant validity (low cross-factor correlation) 4. Test predictive independence (Cf predicts Cf outcomes, not Cr) 5. Examine clinical cases where Cf-high/Cr-low vs. Cf-low/Cr-high
15.3 Intergenerational Transmission Protocol
1. Assess parent generation: pathology (Σ), awareness (RF scale) 2. Assess child generation: pathology (Σ), attachment style 3. Compute η = correlation(Σ_parent, Σ_child) 4. Test moderation by awareness: η × Awareness interaction 5. Control for environmental stressors (ACE, SES)
Chapter 16 — Falsification Criteria
The framework (Tier A claims) is falsified if:
| Criterion | Test | Falsification Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| F1: Channels are non-orthogonal | Factor correlation between Cf and Cr | r > 0.5 across multiple samples |
| F2: Awareness doesn't reduce transmission | η × Awareness interaction | Non-significant or positive interaction |
| F3: Projection shows no temporal signature | Output autocorrelation test | No difference between high-γ and low-γ groups |
| F4: Generic healing = specific healing | Intervention comparison | No outcome difference by specificity |
| F5: Secure attachment count doesn't matter | Attachment regression | ≥1 secure not predictive after controlling for total |
Note: Falsification targets Tier A (empirical) claims only. Tier B (metaphysical) claims are evaluated by coherence and fruitfulness, not by these tests.
Synthesis
Chapter 17 — Master Equations
17.1 The Fundamental Triad
⊙ = (•, Φ, ○)
• = operation (selector + integrator)
Φ = state (medium + transmission)
○ = constraint (filter + interface)
17.2 The Source Flow
Φ∞ →[⊛]→ • →[i]→ ⊙ →[☀︎]→ expression →[return]→ Φ∞
17.3 Complete Equation Set
Aperture: 𝒜 = (G, R, U), T_𝒜 = U ∘ R ∘ G F = ⟨T_𝒜h, T_𝒜⟩ / norms χ = sign(F - τ) Pathology: Σ = (α, β, π, γ) Topology: Lk = Wr + Tw d(Lk)/dt = 0 Channels: ⟨Cf | Cr⟩ = 0 Inheritance: η ∝ Wr · (1 - Awareness) Healing: dS_lie/dt = -α·S_truth·Resonance·Receptivity + β·Reinforcement Sequence: H_f → H_r → H_p → H_d
Chapter 18 — The Complete Picture
What Reality Is
Input flows through apertures (operations), generating beings with fields (states), constrained by boundaries (filters), forming relationships (emergent entities), conserving topology, tending toward or away from fidelity.
What a Being Is
- An aperture performing operations on input (•)
- A field holding and transmitting state (Φ)
- A boundary constraining interactions (○)
- A string extending through time (S)
- A node in relational topology (TRT)
What Love Is
- Functional: Boundary↔Boundary exchange (provision)
- Resonant: Aperture↔Aperture presence (recognition)
Both necessary. Neither sufficient. Orthogonal channels.
The Final Flow
∞ →[•]→ ⊙ →[Φ]→ ⊙ ↔ ⊙ →[W]→ ⊙ →[☀︎]→ ∞ Source → Gate → Being → Field → Relationship → Witness → Being → Return
Appendices
Appendix A — Symbol Glossary
Appendix B — Quick Reference Card
(Print-friendly: Ctrl/Cmd+P)
⊙ CIRCUMPUNCT QUICK REFERENCE
The Triad
| • | Aperture | Operation |
| Φ | Field | State |
| ○ | Boundary | Constraint |
The Four Pathologies
| α | Inflation | Insertion |
| β | Severance | Deletion |
| π | Inversion | Phase flip |
| γ | Projection | Feedback |
Key Equations
Lk = Wr + Tw ⟨Cf | Cr⟩ = 0 η ∝ Wr(1 - Awareness)
Healing Operators
| H_f | Differentiate | → γ |
| H_r | Reconnect | → β |
| H_p | Rephase | → π |
| H_d | Deflate | → α |
Canonical Sequence
H_f → H_r → H_p → H_d (Always address γ first)
Channel Diagnosis
| "Had everything, felt empty" | Cr deficit |
| "Present but didn't provide" | Cf deficit |
Claim Tiers
| Tier A | Empirical (testable) |
| Tier B | Metaphysical (interpretive) |