The Circumpunct Encyclopedia

A Unified Theory of Being, Relationship, and Truth

Version 2.0 — Formalized & Operationalized

How to Read This

1. The Symbol

⊙ = (•, Φ, ○)

• = Aperture (selector + integrator) — does operations
Φ = Field (state + coupling medium) — holds/transmits state
○ = Boundary (constraint + interface) — constrains interactions

Every being is this structure. The ancient symbol encodes complete ontology.

2. The Flow

Φ∞ → • → ⊙ → expression → Φ∞

Source → Gate → Being → Utterance → Return

Truth flows in, gets processed, being emerges, expression returns to field.

3. The Three Domains

Everything in this encyclopedia addresses one of three domains:

Truth
Signal fidelity
F, χ, T vs. L
Relationship
Coupling + third body
κ, Lk, ⊙₁₂
☀︎
Healing
Reducing Σ / knots
H_i, W, TRT
Epistemological Framework

Claim Tiers

This framework makes two kinds of claims. They must be evaluated differently:

Tier A — Empirical Claims

These claims are testable and falsifiable. They make predictions about observable phenomena:

  • Apertures are not self-sourcing (humans transform inputs, they don't generate truth ex nihilo)
  • Functional and resonant channels produce statistically independent outcomes
  • Parental awareness reduces intergenerational error transmission
  • Projection introduces measurable non-Markovian signatures in output

Tier A claims can be supported or refuted by data.

Tier B — Metaphysical/Interpretive Claims

These claims are ontological commitments. They provide interpretive framework:

  • Φ∞ (infinite field) exists as ultimate source
  • Relationship has independent ontological status (⊙₁₂ "exists")
  • Parts are fractals of wholes
  • Lies have no ultimate source (parasitic on truth)

Tier B claims are chosen, not proven. They're evaluated by coherence, fruitfulness, and fit.

Reading guidance: When you see equations and falsification criteria, they target Tier A claims. Tier B provides the interpretive lens but doesn't stand or fall on empirical tests.

Book I

Foundations

Chapter 1 — Ontological Primitives

1.1 The Three Fundamental Components

Symbol Name Type Signature Role
Aperture / Soul Operation: selector + integrator Performs transforms on input
Φ Field / Mind Structure: state + medium Holds and transmits information
Boundary / Body Structure: constraint + interface Filters and constrains interactions

Enforcement rule: Throughout this document, always does operations, Φ always holds/transmits state, always constrains/filters.

1.2 The Circumpunct (⊙)

⊙ = (•, Φ, ○)

Every manifest being is a circumpunct—an aperture (operation) generating a field (state), contained by boundary (constraint).

1.3 The Infinite Field (Φ∞)

Tier B Claim

Φ∞ is the unbounded field—source of all signal, medium connecting all beings.

Tier A Translation

Apertures are not self-sourcing. In practice, humans transform inputs; they don't generate truth ex nihilo. All "original" content traces to prior inputs.

1.4 What Is Φ Made Of?

Φ is the space of constraints + signals that relate circumpuncts.

It is multi-realizable (like computation). Three realizations:

  1. Cognitive: attention, memory, perception, internal representations
  2. Social: language, norms, roles, shared meanings
  3. Physical: sensory channels, bodies, environments, media

This makes Φ a formal field (relational/informational medium), not a claim about new physics.

1.5 Core Axioms

Axiom 1: Parts are fractals of wholes

Every ⊙ contains the structure of its containing system. [Tier B]

Axiom 2: Apertures are throughs, not froms

No aperture is a source. Every aperture transforms input. [Tier A: testable]

Axiom 3: Lies are processing errors

Distortion arises at •, not from an alternative source. [Tier A: testable]

Axiom 4: Relationship is ontologically real

⊙₁₂ has independent existence from ⊙₁ and ⊙₂. [Tier B]

Axiom 5: Categories dissolve

All boundaries are gradients, not discontinuities. [Tier A: testable at measurement resolution]

Chapter 2 — The Aperture Function

2.1 The Core Operation

∞ →[•]→ 1

Input: unbounded potential
Operation: selection + integration
Output: singular actuality

2.2 The Aperture as Operator Triple

𝒜 = (G, R, U)

G: H∞ → H•   Gather/Gate    (selects slice of input)
R: H• → H•   Rotate/Process (transforms selected input)
U: H• → H₁   Utter/Emit     (produces output)

Total map: T_𝒜 = U ∘ R ∘ G
Operationalization

G = attention/selection mechanisms (measurable via eye-tracking, recall tests)
R = cognitive processing (measurable via reaction time, neural signatures)
U = expression (measurable via speech, behavior, physiological output)

2.3 The Fidelity Parameter

F(𝒜) = ⟨T_𝒜h(ψ), T_𝒜(ψ)⟩ / (|T_𝒜h(ψ)| · |T_𝒜(ψ)|)

F ∈ [-1, 1]
F = 1:  Perfect fidelity
F = 0:  Orthogonal to truth
F = -1: Perfect inversion
Operationalization

F = agreement between output and reference standard
Proxies: accuracy scores, consistency measures, inter-rater reliability, signal-to-noise ratios

2.4 The Binary Decision (χ)

χ = sign(F - τ)

χ = +1: truth-mode (F ≥ threshold)
χ = -1: lie-mode (F < threshold)

2.5 Self-Reference Property

𝒜 ∈ State(⊙)

The operator that generates the whole is represented inside the whole. This is "parts are fractals of wholes" in operator language.

Chapter 3 — The Field Equations

3.1 Local Field Dynamics

∇²Φᵢ - (1/c²)(∂²Φᵢ/∂t²) = -ρᵢ(•ᵢ)
Formal Status

This is a modeling choice, not a physics claim. Φ is a formal field (information/relational medium).

Measurable proxies:

  • ρ (source density) = output rate, information generation frequency
  • c (propagation speed) = communication latency, influence delay
  • ∇²Φ (spatial variation) = gradient in connection strength across network

3.2 Field Properties

PropertySymbolMeasurable Proxy
Densityρ_ΦInformation concentration, attention density
ClarityC_ΦLinguistic coherence metrics, signal-to-noise
TurbulenceT_ΦVariance, unpredictability measures
Conductivityσ_ΦNetwork coupling strength, influence coefficients

3.3 Coupled Field Equations

∇²Φ₁ = -ρ₁ - κ₁₂Φ₂
∇²Φ₂ = -ρ₂ - κ₂₁Φ₁
Operationalization

κᵢⱼ (coupling coefficient) = measurable via:

  • Behavioral influence: P(behavior_i | behavior_j)
  • Physiological synchrony: heart rate, skin conductance correlation
  • Linguistic accommodation: vocabulary convergence over time

Chapter 4 — The Boundary Function

4.1 Type Signature

= constraint + interface (structure, not operation)

○: ∂(Φ_local) = surface where Φ_local → Φ_external

4.2 Boundary Properties

PropertySymbolRangeMeasurable Proxy
PermeabilityP[0,1]Self-disclosure rate, influence susceptibility
RigidityR[0,1]Resistance to change under pressure
DefinitionD[0,1]Self/other distinction in reports, behavior

4.3 Boundary Pathology

ConditionConfigurationObservable
EnmeshedP → 1, D → 0Cannot distinguish own vs. other's feelings
FortressP → 0, R → 1Blocks all influence, isolated
PorousP variesInconsistent responses to similar inputs
UndefinedD → 0Identity confusion, unstable self-concept
Book II

Pathology

Chapter 5 — The Aperture Operator Algebra

5.1 The Four Pathologies

Pathologies are equivalence classes of transforms: 𝒜' = ℰ ∘ 𝒜

Inflation (α)
T'(ψ) = T(ψ) + α|self⟩

Type: Insertion error

Observable: Output contains self-reference independent of input

Severance (β)
T'(ψ) ≈ β|void⟩

Type: Deletion error

Observable: Output independent of input variation

Inversion (π)
T' = -T

Type: Phase flip

Observable: Output negatively correlated with truth

Projection (γ)
T'(ψ) = T(ψ + γB̂T(ψ))

Type: Feedback contamination

Observable: Past output predicts current input attribution

5.2 The Syndrome Vector

Σ(𝒜) = (α, β, π, γ)

Diagnosis = estimating Σ from observed outputs.

Operationalization

α = self-reference frequency independent of context
β = input-output correlation (low β = high severance)
π = sign of correlation with reference (negative = inversion)
γ = autocorrelation of output > environment-output correlation

5.3 Pathology Composition

CombinationClinical Pattern
α + γ (Inflation + Projection)Narcissism
β + incomplete RDissociation
π + γ (Inversion + Projection)Paranoia

Chapter 6 — The Syndrome Decoder

6.1 Observable → Syndrome Mapping

ObservableMeasurementIndicates
Amplitude blow-up‖output‖ >> ‖reference‖α (inflation)
Amplitude collapse‖output‖ << ‖reference‖β (severance)
Sign reversal⟨output, reference⟩ < 0π (inversion)
Echo/recursionoutput(t) ~ f(output(t-1))γ (projection)
Input independence∂output/∂input → 0β (severance)

6.2 Syndrome Space

Healthy region:  ‖Σ‖ < ε
Narcissism:      {Σ : α > θ ∧ γ > θ}
Dissociation:    {Σ : β > θ ∧ R_incomplete}
Paranoia:        {Σ : π > θ ∧ γ > θ}
Book III

Topology

Chapter 7 — Temporal Topology

7.1 The String as Worldline

S(t) = ∏ᵢ A(tᵢ)|Φ∞⟩

Each moment of processing extrudes string. The self is a line being drawn, not a sequence of points.

7.2 String Features (Metaphor → Mechanism)

FeatureGeometric MeaningPsychological Correlate
KnotSelf-crossingRecursive pattern, trauma loop
TwistTorsionStored tension, unprocessed stress
LoopReturn to prior pointRepetition compulsion, cycles
BraidInterweavingRelationship history

Chapter 8 — Fundamental Invariants

8.1 Linking Number (Lk)

Lk(S₁, S₂) = (1/2) ∑ crossings ε(c)

Meaning: Fundamental entanglement between two beings.

Key property: Lk is conserved (without cutting). You cannot unlove someone.

8.2 Writhe (Wr) and Twist (Tw)

Wr(S) = ∑ self-crossings ε(c)   (self-knotting)
Tw(S) = (1/2π) ∫ κ(s) ds        (stored tension)

8.3 The Călugăreanu-White-Fuller Theorem

Fundamental Theorem
Lk = Wr + Tw

You can trade between self-knotting and tension, but their sum is conserved.

8.4 Total Relational Topology (TRT)

TRT(person) = {Wr, Tw, ∑Lk, ∑J}

Complete topological fingerprint of relational existence.

Book IV

Resonance

Chapter 9 — Resonance Mechanics

9.1 Field Overlap

Φshared = Φ₁ ∩ Φ₂ + Φemergent

The shared region has properties neither field has alone.

9.2 Aperture Entrainment

dθ₁/dt = ω₁ + K₁₂sin(θ₂ - θ₁)
dθ₂/dt = ω₂ + K₂₁sin(θ₁ - θ₂)

Entrainment iff: K > |ω₁ - ω₂|
Operationalization

θ = phase of processing cycle (measurable via timing, rhythm)
ω = natural frequency (baseline processing rate)
K = coupling strength (synchrony coefficient)

9.3 The Two Channels

ChannelPathContentType Signature
Functional○ → ○Resources, actionsBoundary↔Boundary (constraint exchange)
Resonant• → •Presence, recognitionAperture↔Aperture (operation sync)
Orthogonality Theorem
⟨Cf | Cr⟩ = 0

The channels are statistically independent. One cannot substitute for the other.

Tier A — Testable Prediction

High functional provision (Cf) does not predict resonant satisfaction (Cr) better than chance. Measurable via: satisfaction surveys factored into two scales, showing discriminant validity.

9.4 The Emergent Entity

⊙₁₂ = (•₁₂, Φ₁₂, ○₁₂)

The relationship as entity with its own aperture (shared processing), field (shared state), boundary (shared constraints).

Book V

Signal Theory

Chapter 10 — Truth and Lie Dynamics

10.1 Truth vs. Lie (Formal)

Truth: S_output = α · S_source|_projected + ε   (ε small)
Lie:   S_output = α · S_source|_projected + D + I

D = distortion of received signal
I = insertion from aperture (not traced to input)

10.2 Installation Equation

dA/dt = -λ(A - A₀) + μ · S_lie · Plasticity · Repetition

Lies install when installation pressure (μ term) exceeds restoration pressure (λ term).

10.3 Healing Equation

dS_lie/dt = -α · S_truth · Resonance · Receptivity + β · Reinforcement

Healing iff: α-term > β-term
Operationalization

Resonance = specificity of truth to lie (targeted vs. generic)
Receptivity = openness to correction (defense level)
Reinforcement = ongoing lie exposure from environment

Book VI

Formation

Chapter 11 — The Inheritance Function

11.1 The Imprinting Function

I(τ) = I₀ · e^(-τ/τ_critical) · Window(τ)

Impact of input decays exponentially with age, with critical period windows.

11.2 The η Parameter

η ∝ Wr_parent · (1 - Awareness_parent)

Key insight: Awareness reduces transmission even without complete healing.

Tier A — Testable Prediction

η (error transmission) decreases with parental reflective function / metacognition scores, controlling for stressor exposure and error severity.

Proxy measures: Reflective Functioning Scale, metacognitive awareness inventories, ACE scores (controlling).

11.3 Error-Specific Inheritance

Parent ErrorChild Inherits
InflationExtension role OR copies inflation
SeveranceNo template for source connection
InversionBaseline reality inverted
ProjectionBecomes target, then projector
Book VII

Healing

Chapter 12 — The Witness Function

12.1 Witness Requirements

ConditionRequirementRationale
Lower TRTTRT(w) < TRT(p)Gradient for flow
Sufficient LkLk_min < Lk < Lk_maxChannel exists but not enmeshed
FidelityF(Aw) > θReference signal is clean
StabilityTw(w) < θNot reactive

12.2 The Witness Equation

         ∫ [Wr · (F(Aw) - F(Ap)) · Openness · Lk] dt
Healing = ───────────────────────────────────────────────
                 Resistance + Interference

Chapter 13 — The Healing Operator Algebra

13.1 The Four Operators

OperatorTargetsMechanismObservable Action
H_d (Deflate)αNon-mirroringPresent without admiring
H_r (Reconnect)βPersistent presenceShow up, be affected
H_p (Rephase)πStable referenceSpeak truth, don't argue
H_f (Differentiate)γBoundary + naming"That's yours, this is mine"

13.2 The Canonical Sequence

H_f → H_r → H_p → H_d

1. Stop projection (H_f) — it contaminates all other signals
2. Restore source connection (H_r)
3. Correct phase (H_p)
4. Right-size self (H_d)

13.3 Non-Commutativity

[H_f, H_*] ≠ 0 for all *

Projection interferes with all other healing. Must address first (or concurrently).

Book VIII

Research Program

Chapter 14 — Core Hypotheses

H1: Channel Orthogonality

Claim: Functional (Cf) and resonant (Cr) channels produce statistically independent outcomes.

Test: Factor analysis of relationship satisfaction items should yield two uncorrelated factors. High Cf should not predict Cr outcomes better than chance (and vice versa).

Measures: Develop and validate Cf/Cr scales; test discriminant validity; examine cross-prediction.

H2: Projection Non-Markovian Signature

Claim: Projection (γ) introduces measurable temporal dependencies where past outputs predict current inputs.

Test: In time-series data, γ > 0 iff autocorrelation of output predicts attributed input better than environmental input predicts output.

Measures: Coded interaction sequences; Granger causality tests; compare output→attribution vs. environment→output pathways.

H3: Awareness Transmission Reduction

Claim: η (error transmission coefficient) decreases with parental reflective function, controlling for stressor exposure.

Test: Regression: Child_pathology ~ Parent_pathology × Parent_awareness + controls. Significant negative interaction term supports H3.

Measures: Reflective Functioning Scale; ACE scores; standardized symptom inventories across generations.

H4: Healing Specificity

Claim: Healing requires truth that specifically targets the installed lie (high Resonance term).

Test: Generic affirmations produce less symptom reduction than targeted truth-speaking matched to syndrome profile.

Measures: Pre-post symptom measures; intervention condition (generic vs. targeted); syndrome-matched outcome tracking.

H5: Single Secure Attachment Sufficiency

Claim: One secure attachment during critical period provides sufficient counter-template for recovery potential.

Test: Controlling for total attachment figures, presence of ≥1 secure attachment predicts better adult outcomes than count of insecure attachments.

Measures: Adult Attachment Interview; outcome measures (relationship quality, mental health).

Chapter 15 — Measurement Protocols

15.1 Syndrome Estimation Protocol

1. Collect output stream (speech, behavior, self-report)
2. Establish reference (healthy baseline or external standard)
3. Compute distortion metrics:
   - α: self-reference frequency independent of context
   - β: input-output correlation coefficient
   - π: sign of correlation with reference
   - γ: output autocorrelation vs. environment correlation
4. Estimate Σ̂ = (α̂, β̂, π̂, γ̂)
5. Locate in syndrome space
6. Prescribe H operators based on dominant components

15.2 Channel Discrimination Protocol

1. Administer relationship satisfaction inventory
2. Factor analyze into Cf and Cr subscales
3. Validate discriminant validity (low cross-factor correlation)
4. Test predictive independence (Cf predicts Cf outcomes, not Cr)
5. Examine clinical cases where Cf-high/Cr-low vs. Cf-low/Cr-high

15.3 Intergenerational Transmission Protocol

1. Assess parent generation: pathology (Σ), awareness (RF scale)
2. Assess child generation: pathology (Σ), attachment style
3. Compute η = correlation(Σ_parent, Σ_child)
4. Test moderation by awareness: η × Awareness interaction
5. Control for environmental stressors (ACE, SES)

Chapter 16 — Falsification Criteria

The framework (Tier A claims) is falsified if:

CriterionTestFalsification Threshold
F1: Channels are non-orthogonal Factor correlation between Cf and Cr r > 0.5 across multiple samples
F2: Awareness doesn't reduce transmission η × Awareness interaction Non-significant or positive interaction
F3: Projection shows no temporal signature Output autocorrelation test No difference between high-γ and low-γ groups
F4: Generic healing = specific healing Intervention comparison No outcome difference by specificity
F5: Secure attachment count doesn't matter Attachment regression ≥1 secure not predictive after controlling for total

Note: Falsification targets Tier A (empirical) claims only. Tier B (metaphysical) claims are evaluated by coherence and fruitfulness, not by these tests.

Book IX

Synthesis

Chapter 17 — Master Equations

17.1 The Fundamental Triad

⊙ = (•, Φ, ○)

• = operation (selector + integrator)
Φ = state (medium + transmission)
○ = constraint (filter + interface)

17.2 The Source Flow

Φ∞ →[⊛]→ • →[i]→ ⊙ →[☀︎]→ expression →[return]→ Φ∞

17.3 Complete Equation Set

Aperture:
𝒜 = (G, R, U), T_𝒜 = U ∘ R ∘ G
F = ⟨T_𝒜h, T_𝒜⟩ / norms
χ = sign(F - τ)

Pathology:
Σ = (α, β, π, γ)

Topology:
Lk = Wr + Tw
d(Lk)/dt = 0

Channels:
⟨Cf | Cr⟩ = 0

Inheritance:
η ∝ Wr · (1 - Awareness)

Healing:
dS_lie/dt = -α·S_truth·Resonance·Receptivity + β·Reinforcement
Sequence: H_f → H_r → H_p → H_d

Chapter 18 — The Complete Picture

What Reality Is

Input flows through apertures (operations), generating beings with fields (states), constrained by boundaries (filters), forming relationships (emergent entities), conserving topology, tending toward or away from fidelity.

What a Being Is

  • An aperture performing operations on input (•)
  • A field holding and transmitting state (Φ)
  • A boundary constraining interactions (○)
  • A string extending through time (S)
  • A node in relational topology (TRT)

What Love Is

  • Functional: Boundary↔Boundary exchange (provision)
  • Resonant: Aperture↔Aperture presence (recognition)

Both necessary. Neither sufficient. Orthogonal channels.

The Final Flow

∞ →[•]→ ⊙ →[Φ]→ ⊙ ↔ ⊙ →[W]→ ⊙ →[☀︎]→ ∞

Source → Gate → Being → Field → Relationship → Witness → Being → Return
Reference

Appendices

Appendix A — Symbol Glossary

Circumpunct (complete being = •, Φ, ○) Aperture — operation type (selector + integrator) ΦField — state type (medium + transmission) Boundary — constraint type (filter + interface) Φ∞Infinite Field (source) [Tier B] 𝒜Aperture operator triple (G, R, U) FFidelity ∈ [-1, 1] χBinary decision (±1) ΣSyndrome vector (α, β, π, γ) LkLinking number (conserved) WrWrithe (self-knotting) TwTwist (stored tension) TRTTotal Relational Topology κCoupling coefficient CfFunctional channel (○↔○) CrResonant channel (•↔•) ηError transmission coefficient H_d, H_r, H_p, H_fHealing operators (deflate, reconnect, rephase, differentiate)

Appendix B — Quick Reference Card

(Print-friendly: Ctrl/Cmd+P)

⊙ CIRCUMPUNCT QUICK REFERENCE

The Triad

ApertureOperation
ΦFieldState
BoundaryConstraint

The Four Pathologies

αInflationInsertion
βSeveranceDeletion
πInversionPhase flip
γProjectionFeedback

Key Equations

Lk = Wr + Tw
⟨Cf | Cr⟩ = 0
η ∝ Wr(1 - Awareness)

Healing Operators

H_fDifferentiate→ γ
H_rReconnect→ β
H_pRephase→ π
H_dDeflate→ α

Canonical Sequence

H_f → H_r → H_p → H_d
(Always address γ first)

Channel Diagnosis

"Had everything, felt empty"Cr deficit
"Present but didn't provide"Cf deficit

Claim Tiers

Tier AEmpirical (testable)
Tier BMetaphysical (interpretive)